 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Transparency |
 |
Collaboration
- Alaska’s fisheries management practices are characterized by collaboration among state,
federal and international organizations
- The major fisheries (salmon, groundfish, halibut and crab) are managed by a group of
several different agencies of the state or federal government, responsible for scientific
research, regulatory enforcement, and policy/allocation
- In Alaska, the future of seafood stocks and the environment are more important than
opportunities for commercial harvest
- The state, federal and international processes ensure this by separating
conservation authority from decisions regarding harvest levels
- The conservation agencies are structured so that decisions are made by teams of
scientists, without input or interference from harvesters or other stakeholders
- After the conservation decisions are made, the Alaska Board of Fisheries and the
North Pacific Fishery Management Council make allocation and management
decision
- There is international cooperation as well – every year, Canadian and U.S. scientists from
the International Pacific Halibut Commission set the Total Allowable Catch for the
coming fishing season
Public Decision-Making
- Once the allocation process begins, comprehensive, vigorous public scrutiny and
participation by harvesters, processors, and other stakeholders is welcomed
- The overall decision-making is quite transparent, and it strives to achieve timely,
practicable solutions
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|